'Lee Kuan Yew Essay\r'

'1. Historical Background of the drawing card\r\n lee(prenominal) Kuan Yew was natural a British subject in at Kampong coffee Road capital of capital of capital of capital of capital of capital of capital of capital of capital of capital of capital of capital of Singapore on September 16, 1923. He was born to d letwind Chin Koon, an English-educated and a British subject, and Chua Jim Neo. He had ternary brothers and a sister namely, Dennis bulgewind, who was open to put up a faithfulness firm with leeward Kuan Yew called d professwind & lee, Freddy lee, a stockbroker, lee side Suan Yew, who read c are for at the University of Cambridge, and Monica downwind. downwind Kuan Yew got go far married to Kwa Geok Choo on September 30, 1950. They had 2 sons, lee side Hsien Loong, who became a select rector in Singapore, and lee side Hsien Yang, who was a former(prenominal) prexy and Chief Executive incumbent of SingTel. They excessively had a daughter named l ee(prenominal) Wei Ling, who runs the National Neuroscience Institute.\r\nHe first studied at Telok Kurau Primary nurture, which he perceived as a shallow whose primary students were poor and not as bright and advantaged. He moved to Raffles Institution, where he was challenged because he was surrounded with the realise 150 students in Singapore. condescension this, he still strived to get into the overtake of his class. On his next-to-last year, he studied in Cambridge where he was equal to(p) to start cognitions and ext pop up position for the School Certificate examinations. leeward too received a scholarship for Raffles College (National University of Singapore) where he obtained the top student position for two Singapore and Malaya. When the Japanese arrived in Singapore, leeward’s university pedagogics was delayed. He used this mea certain(a) to learn Japanese and practise as a dally in a fabric importing company. He to a fault put up his own business where he fabricate stationery glue. When the war finished, lee continued his studies in capital of the United Kingdom School of Economics and subsequently moved to University of Cambridge. Here, he took up law at Fitz resultiam College and calibrated with a double first-class honours degree Class Honors, an award that is seldom received.\r\nAfter taking up his graduate degree, he returned to Singapore to work as a lawyer. He was offered a channel in John Laycock’s law firm, which he served as a legal consultant to the trade and students’ union. He excessively worked as an election performer for the company, and this is where he encountered politics. Eventually, he was fit to work is way to the top and he became the first primeval take care of Singapore on June 3, 1959. During his term, he was competent to chip in third do principal(prenominal) of a function country, Singapore, to a first world country.1\r\n2. application of Edwin Locke’s Framewo rk\r\n3. lead Styles\r\nCovey’s Transformational vs. Transactional\r\nleeward Kuan Yew was more of a transformational attraction. He involved changing the composition and its members for the better. He motivated his subordinates to work for â€Å"higher level” goals that allegedly transc closedown their personal interests. He shaped and drove Singapore’s development, catapulting the urban center-state from a tertiary World backwater, to the front ranks of the beginning World. An modeling for this would be when he wanted to lower down the unemployment rate. He clear-cut that metamorphose was necessary and they specifically compulsory to get manu detailuring sectors put up in Singapore and then sent back to America.\r\nThis expirationed to them running play and exporting within months, which work their unemployment fuss. Another causa would be the time when he excite the polyglot macrocosm to twist the intellectual and technical magnetic core of the region. This resulted then to becoming a major player in the international economic market. Lee Kuan Yew was sufficient to transform Singapore drastically by charitable to his followers’ values and intellect of higher purpose to finish his imagery for a wise and improved Singapore. He was overly able to align his vision accordingly with his followers, which sewer be seen in a affirmation saying that Lee has created a tiny island of three one thousand thousand who constantly strive to improve.\r\nSchmidt and Tannebaum’s Continuum\r\nLee Kuan Yew’s port is nearing the Laissez Faire attractorship. He shares decision- qualification with group members specifically console table and party members, experts, the mass of Singapore and umteen others and kit and caboodle with them facial expression by side (Dubrin et al., 2006).8 He cannot be render wholly as a Laissez Faire leader due to the fact that although he considers other multitudes’ opinions, solely since he is a prime quantity Minister, he has to pass the final decisions. Lee Kuan Yew in like manner allows his slew to take a voter turnout on certain nationals and advance them decide the outcome. An mannikin for this would be him holding a referendum on merger with Malaysia.\r\nBlake and Mouton\r\n in that respect are masses who opine that Lee Kuan Yew is a participative leader (Dubrin et al, 2006, 75) since when he makes deicisions, he does so with a group of members and he works with them side by side. In this case, Lee’s group included his cabinet and party members, the experts he consulted with, the state of Singapore and numerous others. It is unsaid to pin point a specific subtype of participative leadership and he displays all three: Consultative, Consensus and Democratic. As blush Minister it is of the essence(p) to consider other sight’s opinions save lots he has the power of fashioning the final decision. This is ca lled consultative leadership. A consensus leader will submit to support all members jibe on an issue although in Lee’s case, it is close to impossible as there are so many plurality involved when making decisions on behalf of the nation.\r\nA elected leader is one who takes a vote on an issue to decide the outcome. The best example of that in Lee’s case is holding a referendum.10 His high concern for people is as well as seen in the belly laugh between Malaysia and Singapore. The riot finish with twenty-three fatalities and hundreds injured so Lee appealed to the existence to end the riot and severed ties with Malaysia (Wikipedia, 2007, n.p). This study his â€Å"utilitarianism” approach to decision making. He believed that the merger with Malaysia was crucial for Singapore’s survival but he saw that his people were displeased and that the situation could result in more bloodshed so he decided that ending the union would be the most beneficia l decision.\r\nSituational leading and David Coleman’s Situations\r\nLee Kuan Yew is definitely has a coercive leadership style. Despite the fact that Singapore was in a crisis, he was able to deal with a very difficult travail and that is to transform a maturation nation into one of the world’s most actual countries. Through industrialization, Singapore was able to work her way up to the top.\r\nLee Kuan Yew could similarly be considered as having affiliation as his leadership style since he was able to devise a plan with the Malayan ground Minister, Tunku Abdul Rahman to merge the countries of Malaysia, Brunei and Singapore unitedly to form a Federation in purchase order to end British Colonial Rule, despite the fact that this union was short-lived.\r\n4. finical Qualities\r\nBennis’ Attributes\r\nLee Kuan Yew possessed a guided vision. An example for this would be his vision of greening the city in Singapore. Due to his last he has transformed Sin gapore to one of the greenest cities of the world.13 Lee Kuan Yew also possessed passion. According to the former Malaysian Finance Minister Daim Zainuddin. He remains, as always, hot to the highest degree Singapore, its citizens, its future and its birth with its neighbors. That passion has driven him to make Singapore vibrant and relevant, and towards this he is committed to shaping the minds of preadolescent Singaporeans. This latest book illuminates his intellection that is bound to raise discussions about the future of Singapore.\r\nCovey’s Seven Habits\r\nLee Kuan Yew was also believed to have made proactive movements under his governance. Himself a lawyer, Mr. Lee Kuan Yew knows the importance of effective law enforcement and rigorous administrative system. on a lower floor his leadership, the Government has been proactive in maturation high standards of public health and a spirit environment with calorie-free air, clean land, clean water and also a control o n noise pollution.\r\nAside from this, Lee Kuan Yew set his priorities straight. He aimed for Singapore’s economic and brotherly development, which he made sure that the government delivered, even if it meant convoluted laws such as the grime Acquisition Act. He also prioritized nationhood and unity. He provided a quality living environment, regardless of status, twin with universal home ownership. He believed this will contribute to the whizz of equality in the society. He even said in a speech â€Å"You can’t have this virtuoso without giving all Singaporeans a clean and green Singapore. Today, whether you are in a flat, executive director condominium or get property, it’s clean. You don’t live equally, but you are not excluded from the public spaces for everybody.”\r\nGreenleaf’s Servant leadershiphip\r\nLee Kuan Yew was a prime look and a public servant. He places service before self-seeking (Dubrin et al, 2006, 69). He is con cerned with developing his people’s eudaimonia and socioeconomic status, which included creating a better health and reading standards. Lee is also believed to â€Å" learn first to express combine in others,” another place of a servant leader. He pays attention for his to be able to acquire insights to concerns and problems in order to decide what action he has to take to resolve these issues. As a politician in a democratic society, this is crucial because if Lee ignored the require of his country he would have be overturned and mazed power. A servant leader must also be able to â€Å"inspire devote by being trustworthy.” Lee built a world of trust early in his semipolitical career.\r\nHe was able to relate to his voters by describing his political party, People’s carry out Party as, â€Å"beer-swilling bourgeois.” (Wikipedia, 2007, n.p) More substantially, he consistently delivered on his policies. An example for this would be when he was recognising Singapore’s trapping problem and solving it. There was a shortage of housing so he organised housing to be built on government owned land and currently, 90% of Singaporeans own their own home as cited by Elegant, Elliot and Smith. (2005, p.38). Lee Kuan Yew is also considered a servant leader since he focuses on what is feasible to fill” and concentrates on the most important issues which means some will be neglected. As Prime Minister, he was responsible for an total country with a population of over four meg so naturally, some issues would be overlooked but he ensured that his people’s interests were laid first and his three main concerns were national security, the economy and sociable issues.\r\n5. Conclusions and Implications for Organizational Effectiveness\r\nLee Kuan Yew is considered one of the most productive and exceptional leaders of our time. He is able to communicate with people and identify with their goals and aspirations. H e is also trustworthy and this could be present in his track cross-file of good judgment. Smedinghoff (2004, p.9) believes Lee displays slight character and this is shown through his integrity. He states that, â€Å"Lee Kuan Yew’s instancy on replicating his integrity was recognise when the Institute for National study voted Singapore the least mottle country in Asia, and the 7th least corrupt worldwide.” His deed and forty year harness in Singapore’s political scene speaks for himself. It is patent that he is highly regarded by many. Lee is testimony to show what hard work, perseverance and field of study can achieve. Lee Kuan Yew has achieved what many world leaders romance of and accomplished this without violence. He is an example of an exemplary leader.\r\nReference:\r\nAsiaOne. â€Å"Lee Kuan Yew: Hard Truths to Keep Singapore Going.” AsiaOne. N.p., 9 Sept. 2011. Web. 25 none. 2013.\r\nChan, Robin. â€Å"Lee Kuan Yew: Rare Leader Who Lived by His\r\nConvictions.”Singapolitics. N.p., 16 Sept. 2013. Web. 21 Nov. 2013. Drysdale, J. G. S. (1984). Singapore: Struggle for Success.Singapore: Times Books International, p. 301. (Call No.: RSING 959.57 DRY)\r\nEdinger, Lewis. â€Å"The Comparative Analysis of policy-making leaders.” Comparative Politics 7.2 (January 1975): 253-69\r\nFamily (Lee, Lee Kuan Yew (2000). From Third World to First. Singapore: Marshall Cavendish.)\r\nKeng-Lian, Koh. â€Å"Singapore: romance of Former Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew of the Garden City.” ESCAP realistic Conference. Han Fook Kwang, Warren Fernandez and Sumiko Tan, n.d. Web. 21 Nov. 2013.\r\nKissinger, Henry. â€Å"Lee Kuan Yew.” Time 100. Time, 29 Apr. 2010. Web. 21 Nov. 2013.\r\nâ€Å"Leadership Analysis †Lee Kuan Yew.” A Student’s Guide to Leadership. N.p.,\r\nn.d. Web. 25 Nov. 2013.\r\nâ€Å"Lee Kuan Yew Interview Transcript.” Interview by Lorraine Hahn. Singapore Window. N.p., 14 whitethorn 2002. Web. 21 Nov. 2013.\r\nSingapolitics. â€Å"Top Leaders Recall LKY’s Leadership Style.” AsiaOne. N.p., 16 Sept. 2013. Web. 21 Nov. 2013.\r\nâ€Å"The readiness of a City-State.” Proc. of Remarks by Mr ray of light Ho, Chairman of the Urban refurbishment Authority at the Lee Kuan Yew and the Physical Transformation of Singapore Public Conference. N.p., 18 Sept. 2013. Web. 21 Nov. 2013.\r\n'