Bush’s Hydrogen Fuel Cells Research Plan: A Step into the Future or a Fallacy :: Argumentative Persuasive Gas Essays

Cars running on hydrogen can instead of gasoline may seem manage something that is seen in a science fiction movie, hardly they may be much closer than many people realize. Pre placementnt supply denote in his State of the Union address that he has plans to take biggish steps forward to advance into the 21st century (quoted by Porteus ). This promotion is to come in the form of a $1.2 billion plan to service of process fund research into hydrogen fuel. By doing this furnish plans to lessen the Statess reliance on foreign oil, and help to protect the environment. The Bush administration trusts that this program will someday boost Americans economy and national security (quoted by Porteus). The new plan replaces an out of date one that was originally started during the Clinton administration. Clinton spent silver funding research to compel more fuel efficient cars instead of spending property on hydrogen fuel electric cell research. Bush intends to change this pl an so that instead of using less oil, we will someday need none. The Bush administration has divided the funding into two major projects. Over quintuplet years, the FreedomCar project is designed to research ways to use hydrogen fountain in automobiles. In addition, the FreedomFuel project is designed to research ways to produce, store, and dole out the fuel to the public (Hakim 17). Although Bushs plan seems as though it is a very good idea, there is a major line as to whether or not such a large meter of money should be spent on funding hydrogen fuel cells. Many opposing hydrogen fuel cell research believe that it is too far into the future to spend so much money on. One of the biggest concerns with this idea is that we be not lowering fuel standards succession research is being done on hydrogen fuel. They argue that money is being wasted on an idea that may never wreak when it is possible to lower fuel usage if Clintons plan is followed. inappropriate many polit ical arguments this one is not split totally surrounded by liberals and conservatives there is a pro-Bush side and an anti-Bush side. This does not mean that either side is for or against Bush they are simply against his hydrogen fuel cell funding. The pro-Bush side tends to be more liberal and the anti-Bush side leans to the conservative side, but because there is no clear separation of sides, you cannot say all liberals are pro-Bush and all conservatives are anti-Bush.